Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Alan Arnett's avatar

"And I have always believed you have to find as many dots as possible before figuring out how — and to what end — to connect them.

If you are looking for facile explanations and gurus sharing their received knowledge (especially in the rapid-fire, sing-song broetry style), you need to look elsewhere."

Well said Stowe. To add a dot to the conversation, from the world of applied creativity (problem solving not art) people have sometimes heard of 'divergent thinking' (discovering new dots) and 'convergent thinking' (joining them in new ways). They may even have seen the two combined into a diamond shape, especially these days from design thinking or elsewhere. But most people misunderstand how they work. They narrow their options in divergence, and jump to conclusions in convergence, because its more comfortable to do that. We like to have 'certainty'. Even if its wrong because dots are missing.

Finding dots and connecting them is a lifelong practice, not a temporary distraction from pitching certainty. You can't track every possible dot for every problem, but you can notice your own filters and look beyond them.

Susan Murphy's avatar

Do my eyes deceive me? This is the real Stowe Boyd that I got so much from back in the golden days of Twitter circa 2006ish? I’m so glad to have found your wisdom here. Love your take on all things! Sorry for fangirling.

6 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?