Trading Flexibility for Soft Surveillance
Now that companies are (grudgingly) accepting remote work, they want something in exchange.
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F243840b9-1d87-4caa-aeca-60f313b9bcb1_6000x4000.jpeg)
A quick dissection of a HBR piece by Margaret Luciano, called 4 Ways Managers Can Increase Flexibility Without Losing Productivity. I wanted to use this as an example of how hard the transition to a fast-and-loose, self-willed organization will be for traditionalists.
The abstract includes this declarative sentence, which sets the tone of the article:
If employees want the benefits of flexibility, they’ll also need to shoulder some of the responsibility that goes with it, like autonomous problem-solving and providing and checking for updates.
I doubt that many workers want to avoid autonomous problem-solving, but the real quid pro quo is this: if workers want flexibility they will have to accept some soft surveillance with managers in exchange.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Work Futures to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.